Showing posts with label competence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label competence. Show all posts

Sunday, August 3, 2014


Learner therapist (16)……What’s a good enough therapist

Torrey Orton
August 3, 2014

I set myself the goal for my CPD tasks two years ago to design a generic therapist competences framework. This is the first cut. It begins with the name – the good enough therapist – which intentionally borrows from Donald Winnicott’s ‘good enough mother’. We could do with a bit more good enough these days, and maybe I was thinking the same for therapists. My objective is to use this framework as a template for self-assessment, with elements of professional assessment added as possible – that is, as I can succeed in finding colleagues who are prepared to judge.

I have enquired around the formal psych fraternity – especially the APS and some of its associated colleges – to find so far that no one has a generic, or a context-specific, competence framework for therapists, even the CBT squad. So there is no agreed framework for evaluating anyone’s performance, apart from the “clinical psychologist” qualification standard of CBT masters and similar. Anyone with a slight degree of program evaluation experience knows that quals are only the starting place. It is therapeutic processes and outcomes that count for patients.

 And as for the processes and outcomes of therapy a few things are clear. First, the nature of the therapeutic relationship from both points of view is a major contributor to perceived therapeutic effectiveness. Second this effect stands without regard to the therapeutic system, modality, theory or fantasy which a therapist brings to the relationship. Third, therapeutic improvement can best be achieved by constant checking with patients about their continuing perceptions of effectiveness of the experience of being in therapy with one. Fourth, the generic therapist must be able to engage with any presenting patient, even if only long enough to identify that a referral to a specialist of some sort is appropriate (and have a resource of such specialists on hand).

 
Here are some competences, knowledge and skills: no special order. I am seeking all and any suggested additions to the following first. Then, I’ll entertain alteration or deletion suggestions to the items listed.


1)      Intercultural communication, which includes knowledge of relevant cultural differences affecting application of preferred treatment(s) and the capacity to negotiate the treatment process. The key test of this competence is the capacity to understand and accept that the suite of assumptions and practices which constitutes Anglo psychotherapy will not be wholly shared by cultures like Chinese, fundamentalist religious practitioners (Jewish, Christian, Moslem, Hindu….), etc. In the end this competence would be exhibited by not working with some cultures rather than assuming one can work with all which one doesn’t know enough to know they are immutably different from one’s own.

 

2)      In vivo, person to person negotiation of the therapeutic process, including review / evaluate each session with patients, without shielding oneself by a diagnostic stance presuming the therapist knows best. A test for this competence might be the holding of a patient who experiences themselves as sometimes ‘crazy’ or out of control and demonstrates that self-perception in the room.

 

3)      Knowledge of a full range of therapeutic approaches, techniques and work styles, including how these approaches integrate with each other at different times in the therapeutic engagement. E.g. – CBT, IPT, dynamic therapies, behavioural therapies, ACT, Mindfulness, etc.

 

4)      Experience being in therapy oneself, not just supervision, so the more permeable boundaries of one’s self are in view and acknowledged as such – as being in flux – and how affecting that flux is of one’s availability to patients under various personal circumstances and conditions.

 

5)      A theory of the self which is holistic, embracing at least the biopsychosociocultural paradigm’s domains, with awareness of the spiritual and economic.

 

6)      A theory of life span learning stages and the processes through which they are experienced by people, including micro learning processes and their integration into life span learning.

 

7)      A human needs construct like:

Elements of well-being (basic human needs)

*From: The Treatment of Sex Offenders: Risk Management and Good Lives.

Tony Ward, University of Melbourne, Claire A Stewart, Deakin University, 2005

 

Without specified needs we cannot decide how we are doing and what trade-offs are required to improve well-being. One approach to defining basic needs is this:

 

Needs
Wants specifications of needs
1) Life (including healthy living and functioning)
Adequate sleep, food, exercise
2) Knowledge
Knowing that…Knowing how to….knowing why…etc.
3) Excellence in play and work (including mastery experiences)
Play an instrument, a sport; Practice a profession, trade, art, hobby…
4) Excellence in agency (i.e., autonomy and self-directedness)
Cooperative activities; enlisting others in our activities
5) Inner peace (i.e., freedom from emotional turmoil and stress)
Meditation, martial arts,
6) Friendship (including intimate, romantic and family relationships)
Appropriate care, affection, connectedness….
7) Community
Authentic membership, identification, …
8) Spirituality (in the broad sense of finding meaning & purpose in life)
Relevant belief, imagery, contemplation….
9) Happiness
In my view this is not a need; it is one  outcome of well-being
10) Creativity
Opportunities to invent at whatever level or domain of life activity (also a doubtful need)

 

8)      Understanding of social systems and the individual’s place in them, especially family systems, workplace systems and social systems generally.

 

9)      Capability in leading patients through actual or virtual reconciliation cycles, including creating and sustaining the power to be heard within those systems.

 

10)   Ability to hold and contain intense feelings, with a view to building patient authenticity and authority about those feelings. Confronting high risk subjects: suicide, violence to others or self, crime, abuse and how to contain an emotional outburst of any kind.

 

11)   Ability to recognise and admit own mistakes appropriately as they happen…..be a continuing learner with specific development aims and goals.

 

12)   Understand what makes research good enough and what important emerging evidence-based research shows about good enough psychological processes. Neuropsychology presents as a must appreciate emerging field.

 

13)   Capacity to make good enough judgments in the room about:

Talking about possible need for medication

Knowing where patients are at, or up to

Managing exposure therapy at the right pace / depth

How far to pursue a patient who is loosely engaged in therapy

Appropriate self-disclosure

Quantity of therapist input required

Boundaries of contact: in the room only?

 

14)  Having workable definitions of the main therapeutic entities: person, couple, family….

 

15)  Knowing at least one therapeutic paradigm in depth and a number of others to level of workable confidence

 

16)  Supervision - peer and professional; one-to-one and group.

 

17)  Knowing when to refer and being free to do so

 

18)  Having a collegial support network

 

19)  Having had an ordeal to prove you’ve got the commitment to do therapy; mastery of personal suffering and success

 

20)  Wider life experience: jobs, vocations, volunteer work, etc.

 

21)  Having a workable theory of contemporary life: it’s challenges, rewards, distortions and distractions

Friday, April 29, 2011

Learner therapist (7) …Listening for talent


Learner therapist (7) …Listening for talent
Torrey Orton
April 29, 2011


This is only a taster for a longer trip. Hopefully there's enough indications of the trip purpose and process to warm others up for a later journey.


Not everyone speaks well. They have to struggle for words or thoughts. Things just seem to come to others. Here's one words don't come to in his first session:


By 40 minutes into it I didn't think that we had anything to work on. He was a litany of falteringly expressed sadness, aimlessness and hopelessness, presented almost as if they were a state, not a need. There was nothing for me to hold – that was his state, until I heard his language. I was listening for the strength (agency) which brought him into therapy. For someone claiming no discernible talent his presentation was peppered lightly with very particular vocabulary – not at all that of the truck driver he claimed truly to be. I had noted the words as he rambled around his self-described misfit history, but not noticed them for the talent they exposed. I confirmed my notice by pointing out that he had such language and he both recoiled at the idea he had anything and brightened up with the notice in one move. It wasn't clear to me that he had verbal talent. He had capability, and so maybe talent not just training.


It has turned out that he has quite a verbal talent. Everyone has some talent, some quite a lot and some quite a few – the Renaissancers among us. They often, especially those showing up for therapy, do not know or trust their talent. It may have been a cause, or collateral effect, of the injuries which brought them to therapy. Sometimes they show up as a loss of talent, as here:


At a social event I met a lifelong male painter, now 63, who was visibly flat and poured it out smoothly. He had lost his painting muse or mojo or animus and so was wandering around for the first time in his life with nothing to do. For a talented person whose gift was clear and commanded what to do, every day was given by the gift. He literally had lost his way, his inner light which showed him the path. That light had shown brightly since early primary school when a teacher recognised it by saying, "You should be a painter."Now he was lightless for the first time. I saw him again a few weeks later and he was still befuddled by his self-abandonment (it must have been himself, he thought; no one else stole his light from him).all that of the truck driver he claimed to be.h ng to grab for me until I heard his language. For someone presenbting tent ho


Whether he was a good painter or not is irrelevant to the matter of his talent. That 'good' is for discussion another time under the heading of competences or capabilities. The world is full of possible painters, fishers, writers, fixers, fighters, builders…. Few are great, but many are satisfied if they know and live their talent(s). There's room for many levels of the many talents.


Finding ones talent(s) can be a grounding experience, providing for the first time in our lives a source of truth which is reliably ours. It is no guarantee that a way will be made for our talents to enter the world, but knowing that they come from within is heartening and self-defining. Basic life standards are self-sourced and the associated motivation is self-validating. Just exercising the talent(s) creates further motivation.


There may be many ways to bring the talent into the world, allowing exploration and exercise of it even under conditions of low potential success – where a person's existing life commitments to partners, children, parents, siblings prohibit a fulltime engagement with the emerging talent. Equally restricting may be the low wattage of the talent – visible, palpable but not powerful to be a life on its own, yet still providing inner based illumination. We all have a complete suite of the talents necessary for life, just differently arrayed and enabled. The array and enabling are congenital; their growth and enactment are circumstantial (the domain of nurture and effort).


What the range of talents is can be taken from one or another of the emerging systems of well-being, all of which depend on defining the domains, directions and intensities of action which create well-being. Getting the items and their mixes right is essential, since well-being is specific. I like the "Elements of well-being" because they were created by the authors in an effort to provide a new approach to treatment of sex offenders, a notoriously difficult group.


Elements of well-being (basic human needs)
*From: The Treatment of Sex Offenders: Risk Management and Good Lives.
Tony Ward, University of Melbourne, Claire A Stewart, Deakin University


1) Life (including healthy living and functioning) 2) Knowledge 3) Excellence in play and work (including mastery experiences) 4) Excellence in agency (i.e., autonomy and self-directedness) 5) Inner peace (i.e., freedom from emotional turmoil and stress) 6) Friendship (including intimate, romantic and family relationships) 7) Community 8) Spirituality (in the broad sense of finding meaning & purpose in life) 9) Happiness 10) Creativity


And, by the way, if you want to think about what the generic therapeutic task is from a biopsychosocial (cultural) viewpoint – this is it: a multidimensional well-being one. Elaborating that perspective is a task for another day. Well-being constructs like that above are starters. They are also the basis for work on things like vocation (below), since the kinds of vocations there are must reflect the needs we strive to fulfil through work.


This set of archetypal vocations was built with Hamid Homayouni 5 years ago in the birthing phase of a 'what do you want to be when you grow up?' company which never grew up. However, many patients have found the constructs helpful for their efforts to build a picture of their vocational potential. The archetypes are described in ordinary language and everyday behaviours.
  • Helper

Are you…compassionate, attentive to others' needs, a 'fixer'?

Do you like to…offer help, give suggestions, 'fix' things for others?
Are you good at… listening to others, putting your own thoughts in their terms, seeing how others really are, suggesting options for action…?
  • Builder
Are you… physical, careful, 'results oriented', a 'tool man' (or woman)?

Do you like to…complete a piece of work, have something to show for your efforts?

Are you good at…making things with your hands, planning steps of development, using tools?
  • Protector
Are you…cautious, attuned to possible dangers / threats, physically and emotionally robust, action-oriented?
Do you like to…be in dangerous situations, test your strength against others, use weapons, wear uniforms?
Are you good at…containing conflicts, dealing with anger, checking threats, using your body as an instrument?
  • Entertainer /artist
Are you…flamboyant, emotional, and imaginative?
Do you like to…tell stories, draw pictures, make videos?
Are you good at…performing, working under public pressure, taking on different roles and styles?
  • Maintainer
Are you…orderly, systematic, obsessive about detail?
Do you like to…keep things in order, clean things, know how things work, take them apart to see how they tick?
Are you good at…keeping things running, making repairs, figuring out what's wrong with things?
  • Believer / visionary
Are you…'off in the clouds' at times, certain where you stand, looking for the answers to the final questions?
Do you like to… wonder about 'the meaning of life, engage others in questions of meaning?
Are you good at…seeing the larger picture, talking about 'the meaning of life'…?
  • Thinker / investigator
Are you…introverted, abstract, logical, pattern seeking, 'deep', insightful?
Do you like to… get things clear, understand rather than act, find your way through confusion and unclarity, put the truth first …?
Are you good at…seeing patterns in things, making systematic pictures of things, making sense of puzzles / dilemmas ….?
  • Creator / entrepreneur
Are you…a starter, sensitive to new things, early adopter of technologies / ideas?
Do you like to…be the first to do things, be recognised for innovation?
Are you good at…expressing, creating visual / musical works, starting up from nothing?
  • Coordinator / leader
Are you…someone who steps forward first, takes the lead in social / political things?
Do you like to…negotiate shared tasks and resources, talk to people about what they want / need?
Are you good at…keeping a group together around shared tasks?