Showing posts with label error. Show all posts
Showing posts with label error. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2014


Learning to act right (41)… a smile of shame
Torrey Orton
April 23, 2014

 It was a smiling shame, what I did…

...and the scooter driver picked it, but wrongly, the minute he pulled up next to my driver’s side window. My mistake enraged him and powered my shame more intensely, as he pointed out that my smile was an indication of my pleasure at his endangerment by my pulling in front of him as he was trying to pass in the curb-side lane. I had completely missed him in the blind spot of the rear-view mirror, partly because I was making a late decision to go for a parking space next to the bread shop and partly because I was coming off a reasonably intense couple of hours witnessing Catholic anti-abortionists harass patients at the Fertility Control Clinic.


Cause aside, I was so stricken at my near mushing of man and scooter that I didn’t even think to apologise and he was gone before I pulled myself out of my dumb smile in the light of my exposed incompetence – a variant on struck dumb in the lights of the hunter – now doubly self-condemned for not having acknowledged my fault.


But for this mistake, I would still not know that I, too, can smile at being caught out in error. Not something I’d ever experienced before, but never before had there been a possibly catastrophic error for an innocent other. For years I have thought and taught that it is a cultural characteristic of Chinese to stand in the face of a public event like a car accident and smile broadly at the remains of the victim(s).


I’d seen it happen often enough in Shanghai to know my experience wasn’t a peculiar oncer. My Chinese acquaintances and friends explained fluently that such smiling and laughing was an expression of embarrassment. So it was something recognisable to them, as well. Anxiety, guilt and shame are universally available in human cultures, but their expressions differ so conflictedly that imagining the ‘wrong’ other’s version is near impossible. They just don’t pass the knife/fork vs. chopsticks test – eating looking wrong can be intimately offensive from whichever privileged angle you look at it.

 
But understanding the feeling-behaviour connection has never been simple. For us (native English speakers?) a blank or frowning look is appropriate for publically played out personal disasters. Little have I ever thought I would be able to pull off with such precision what I thought a major cultural difference. Hopefully, unlike other differences which I have mastered with intent, this one I fluked through inattention will be the oncer. I suspect that the conditions of its occurring this time will not often recur and so cannot be pre-empted even with practice. The slighter flushed downcast expression of embarrassment (cousin of guilt and shame) warns only weakly of the overwhelming energy unleashed in my smiling shame.


Maybe this is what a thick skin protects for those prone to exposing themselves in public.

 

Sunday, April 6, 2014


Learning to act right (40)… Skating on thin ice…

Torrey Orton

April 6, 2014

 

 Learning to predict a terminal fall at the boundary between solid and fluid

 

Learning to calculate risks is a basic achievement for the conduct of everyday life. I’m talking here of things like how many steps to take in one bite on the way up or, more saliently, down life’s stairways. How good is my chance of crossing the street against the lights between legal crossings without getting scrunched by the bus coming one way and the truck from the other? Cultural variants on this theme, and adult opportunities to re-experience childhood learnings, can be found here: http://diarybyamadman.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/travel-funnies-2014-china-torrey-orton.html .

 

As these things do, the idea of my learning to skate on thickening ice came into recent view. Especially to skate on clear ice. Clear ice means this: when you walk on it you can see straight into the water. On very clear ice it’s hard to tell that the ice is there. It is the colour of the underlying water. I grew up looking down a hill big enough to provide an extremely beginners ski slope (20 meter rise) onto a small New England pond (about 200 meters by 50 meters), the sort which seems to make up about ¼ of the surface area of the region.

 

We started learning about ice when we were in nappies…which is to learn about the progress of winter from turning of the leaves to slight freezing of the ground with increasing periods of frost on grass and puddles along the way to earth frozen to a concrete consistency and ice carrying a hundred people sliding around with greater and lesser finesse. Snow may or may not appear anywhere along this transition.

 

So by age four or five we would amble down to check the pond’s willingness to be crossed dry-footed. New ice can be safe yet cracking, the progress of skating being a pushing along the wave of the ice flowing down and up as one passes. If you haven’t experienced this phenomenon, tough. I can’t think of a similar elsewhere in nature except for a lava flow which fails the similarity test by starting with death from the ride rather than ending with ice, though ice is also greatas the poet said (Robert Frost, appropriately, in Fire and Ice, refusing to complete the implicit ‘nice’ for a rhyme).

 

Then, there was the problem of varying ice depth across the pond, arising from the faster flow of the stream part of the pond in some areas, and not just the obvious ones near where the stream ran into it and out of it. This danger is perceptible with practice (usually including some drops into the water). Skill growth is marked by a reduction in the number of feet dropped together and how far (also feet in those days!). Skill improvement requires the perennial favourites: cautious and a delicate testing touch with toe or stick, often noted by their absence among risk takers.

 

What we learned to solve here was a repeated pile of rice problem: at what height of added grains will it collapse. For skaters the collapse of the ice will be wet feet at least and drowning at most. Learning to judge the risk involves a lot of factors underpinned by the ignorant fearlessness of the young and sustained by their invariable superiority to adults in perceptual sensitivity and reflex action speeds, coupled with their relative lack of weight! A rice collapse will just be a mess, unless you are in a storage silo.

 

I don’t know that I’d try a newly glazed pond surface these days, but my chance of seeing one are slim. I don’t usually go north for winter. That dogs and deer often fail this learning test is one sign of its difficulty, especially when the ice surface is snow-covered – a degree of difficulty in discernment beyond most people’s capability.

Thursday, October 31, 2013


Learner therapist (40)…… Blame as a life span development factor
Torrey Orton
Oct. 31, 2013

Lifelong learning’s performance engine – error and blame

What I’m about to say is unremarkable. Its purpose is to rehabilitate the concepts of responsibility and blame, especially the latter. Blame enjoys a very modest reputation these days. In the therapeutic and associated (e.g. criminology, health…) trades some would like to execute blame with a severe termination and others less certain hold it at the distance that a bad smell requires to be noticed but not be uncomfortable. I will attempt the rehabilitation by situating blame among the broadest of human concepts – life span development. Here goes.

I look at therapy as a specialised learning trip for the repair of psycho-spiritual injuries acquired in the process of upbringing and adulthood. This view places therapy inside the range of lifespan development. Life span development, in turn, has some predictable or, perhaps more precisely, unavoidable stages, steps, challenges, obstacles …choose the noun which fits your current developmental situation.

Every human meets at least two of these stages by default: birth and death. The rest are somewhat subject to individual choices. They are foreseeable but not predictable in the usual sense of that word. Putting the same point another way: while the life pathway can be mapped for humanity, everyone’s place on it takes precedence over their stage in it; stages are retrospective markers of passage. Ask a parent if having children was anything like what they imagined from their experience of being children or their instruction by their elders about what it would be like. Answer: usually, no.
Life stages and needs
There are a number of life stage systems around which overlap with human needs. For example, consider Maslow’s hierarchy which somewhat proceeds upwards from infancy to late adulthood without ever exactly saying so. The bottom rung (the ground) is survival matters of food shelter and safety; the top (varying with cultures) may be self-realisation (the Western one) and/or individual integration in social structures (Eastern).

Robert Kegan’s view of the developmental process is something like this:

Our psychospiritual development as individuals is, in fact, a series of ever-more-inclusive disidentifications and identifications. As Kegan (1982) notes in his developmental sequence, we go from the neonate stage of being our sensations and reflexes to having them but being our perceptions, from there to having perceptions but being our needs and interests, from that stage to having needs and interests but – at adolescence -- being our relationships, and so on. With each successive stage comes an ever-greater capacity to identify with – and then disidentify from – a deeper layer of ourselves (MacVicar, 1985).
From Mental Health Academy course – Principles of Psychosynthesis


He’s marking related but distinctive stages to Maslow’s, which have something to do with levels of consciousness, somewhat akin to a dialectic – the cyclical relay of experience from being to having and back to being along a ladder of concreteness to abstraction. As such it is also a ladder of accountability and prospective praise or blame – depending on how ones transit turns out for oneself and our unavoidably involved others (relatives, friends, classmates…).
Development and purpose
The objective of life span development is to become competent, agile, excellent, good, diverse….all different aspects of purpose. This is what all sexually reproducing organic beings do – they become themselves, which can be done more or less well, for many reasons. Some of these are within the being’s grasp (intelligence, efficient fuel usage, etc.), some arrive by chance (in the range of environments they inhabit) and some reasons are matters of inheritance (all beings vary from their genetic and cultural originals to some degree).

Human beings add purpose and meaning to the passage. In fact, pursuit of purposes that give meaning to effort and results is a central director of effort. The meaning may be intrinsic or extrinsic. When young, we depend on our elders for meanings beyond the organic ones of survival and pleasure. Growing up is, under right conditions of meaning, the building of meaning-making capabilities.
Growing by stumbling…
Now, working thru the Kegan stages, or any other developmental sequence, is a matter of trial and error, while on predictable pathways. This trip has a thousand names from the Platonic seeking of the ideal forms through the Hegelian coursing of the dialectic to Wilber’s implicit integrity, and I haven’t mentioned a religion yet. While predictable, we have to learn and discover our particular journey by missteps. We do not learn much from correct steps…they are converted after a few successful repetitions to automatic capabilities.

…and by playing
A principal means of making the passage is play - a naturally occurring function under conditions of safety, and sometimes in spite of them. Play entails a high possibility of error, of inadequate efforts, of approximations to a competent performance. Self-correction, applied with a persistent but light hand, is the main tool of developmentally effective play. For self-correction we need responsibility and accountability for our efforts. And we are back to blame and blameworthiness. Adults are notoriously bad at play, unless artificially fuelled (drink, drugs…) and/or socially authorised (celebrations of various levels from a night on the turps to days on agricultural fairs or sports).

These overlap and intertwine, of course. Our adult weakness in the face of need for play is fear of judgment…that we will be blamed for being incompetent. Children have to be taught that fear. They take stumbling as natural and pick themselves up. But some child and adulthood errors are forced on us by others. These constitute the bulk of psychologically damaging traumas. Even if the force is applied by mistake, the others still are to blame – they did it. They produced injury.
A view of taking the blame to effect: from Dana Milbank’s review of K. Sebelius’ interrogation by the US House of Reps two days ago.

The taking –
“Access to HealthCare.gov has been a miserably frustrating experience for way too many Americans,” she said in her opening statement. “So let me say directly to these Americans: You deserve better. I apologize. I’m accountable to you for fixing these problems. And I’m committed to earning your confidence back by fixing the site.”
And the effect –

…But many of her interrogators were unusually mild, probably disarmed by Sebelius’s self-criticism…

Sunday, April 21, 2013



Learner therapist (34)……Not good enough therapist

 

 Learner therapist (34)……Not good enough therapist
Torrey Orton
April 21, 2013

Another of my therapeutic errors…
A year ago I wrote:

I am somewhat obsessively tuned to my mistakes, a commitment moderated by a fairly balanced level of professional self-regard. However, it seems that mistakes continue to occur in sufficient numbers and powers to guarantee the balance falls slightly towards the obsessive side. From my point of view, my reputation is always in danger from my next performance.

And a striking case has arisen, as they do, totally predictable as sessions went on, but avoided by me out of my self-imposed belief that I should always be able to work with anyone and that I am infinitely flexible. Yes, I see the universalising and that I am in the grip of moderate catastrophising, but that’s the price of standards in practice (another argument this, but not now). I pay this price a few times a year in the currency of disturbed sleep and therapeutic relationship crises (in my mind often). Here’s this one:

In brief, he’s a 33 year old in a growingly committed relationship with a woman he characterises as anxious like himself. They are on the verge of cohabiting. But he doesn’t share with her the vitality of his anxiety – that it is persistent, permanent, paralysing – which he deploys like a shield from his deep sense of being notgoodenough. This sense has been unavoidably present to him for 10 years post a major car accident recovery, which took a year of physio and some subsequent therapies through a parade of therapists and psychiatrists of which I am the last, so far, in line.

We’ve been one session a week for three months on an insurance funded therapeutic journey. It was limited to 5 in the first instance and then only after review which I did not do at the time. I had never clearly monitored the conditions of the insurance. So, I was working for free.

He knows his notgoodenough comes from somewhere further back in his past, and has recently acknowledged that father is the obvious source. Father has never been accessible to him nor outreaching for him, though always present… an active, unconscious (?) denial of the son’s existence. Mother appears as the good parent, though almost acknowledgeable as a collusive partner in father’s absent presence. She is also in late stages of thrice recurrent cancers, so seriously compromised as a pathway to the father, or even a discussant of son’s needs.

He can do anger at two things: his parents, but especially his father, and me if I suggest he “out” his admittedly socially phobic obsessions and compulsions to anyone, but especially his girlfriend. When angry he presents clearly as powerful – language strong (f bombing) and posture strike ready. Outing is part of a process of exposure which is a widely accepted ingredient of anxiety and addictive therapies, and one I’ve used in a wide variety of situations with workable effectiveness for patients of many sorts. I said as much to him in roughly the following words:

The principle reason for encouraging self-outing of any kind is to reduce the burden of the un-outed secret(s) which, for lack of psycho-spiritual-relational air, fester in the paranoid richness of the dark holding bay of the self. At this point it was a crucial move because we were going around in circles and the only talking place for this was therapy.

There exists alongside the phobic persona a competent, though self-doubting, one with a wide range of social and potentially professional skills, and with better than average verbal skills, both spoken and written. He is supposed (psychiatric report) to have done CBT for self-doubt, but shows little retention. He’s devoted to the latest manual driven self-improvement thingy about social phobia – very CBTish in style. He hasn’t been able to stick with any such processes or related tracking of moods over the three months, though getting started a couple of times. He’s swamped by the daily flux of his fears, and amplifies them at each session by arriving late and leaving early, starting to notice the approaching self-imposed departure time 30 minutes into the session.

Because of his intense resistance to raising his phobia with his girlfriend or selected workmates and his increasingly reported despair about the phobia (expressed in spontaneously written emails capturing the daily experience), I felt trapped and ineffective and looking to reduce it by stopping our work and handing him on to someone appropriate.

I had not confronted him with this thought, but he could have been aware of my doubt from my unwillingness to add another session to the present once a week. He has history for losing therapists because they cannot / will not fit into his workplace secrecy regime which requires him to do nothing in work time (even if lunch) which might invite a question from colleagues or management about what he’s doing.

I did not feel that I had the time or mood flexibility to respond usefully to his needs. At the same time, progressively over the preceding two weeks, I found myself under a rapidly increasing load of high need patients. It takes a while for me to notice I’m close to not coping, but I’m getting better at it. This is a significant straw in this story, and this camel’s back was bending. With this case I was feeling like death and actually surrounded by long term patients considering themselves as candidates for death. My decision to discontinue our work came off a base of having done similar things at very high pressure times of near overwhelm over the decades of my organisational development practice, both here and in China.

A few days ago we had our first session since my coming to the conclusions above about my needs and his. He walked in and started immediately with his doubts about how we were going, beating me to the task. Within 20 minutes we had agreed that I would find him an alternative therapist within the day and pass that option back to him, which I did. He was a bit angry that he had once again lost a start on therapy which happened partly because he did not demand at intake that the proposed therapist (in this case, me) work outside normal hours. Some of the other lost therapists had parted for similar reasons, he said.

I think from the backside of my failed effort that it is principally a result of insufficient checking with the patient about how things were going for him. Checking is about the only antidote to letting things amble along when they really aren’t ambling much at all. And it is not as if I don’t check regularly. But maybe it is that I check somewhat less regularly than I think and that rigorous attention to checking (putting it explicitly on every session’s agenda) would reveal a pattern that somewhat more diffident checking occurs with more diffident patient experiences – and it’s my diffidence I’m talking about here. My failure to check the insurance requirements for continued payment are party to my self-deception or avoidance.

As I said at the start: “my self-imposed belief that I should always be able to work with anyone and that I am infinitely flexible”  may facilitate my not taking seriously some recurrent but slight evidence that things are not getting very far or very well, though they continue! As so often in development matters, awareness is all except when it isn’t enough, as in this case. I know exactly what that self-monitoring awareness feels like from my commitment over the last 6 weeks to raising my performance in aikido weapons practice to both a higher intensity and greater regularity. The subject is always close to the front of mind, including when I choose to not make the required effort.

For the moment it is clear that my reputation to myself as an aikido practitioner is more important than my professional one!!

Tuesday, July 3, 2012


Learning to act right (27)… I didn't see anything, really!!
Torrey Orton
July 03, 2012


"I did not see anything I could swear to in a court of law"

Six months ago I wrote:

I am surprised to re-learn (assuming I ever did originally learn this) how unreliable my perception of live events can be, how open to multiple interpretations, how filled with material lacunae such that a report of the event would be more holes than whole. …
…How easy it is for my reason to fly off in a rage where my righteousness rules the moment to moment equation of time seeking justification in worthy action.

A few days ago this happened on the same stage:

Dramatis personae – Eddy the Wednesday security guard, me, Purple Shirt the lone HoGPI and an FCC staffer; a patient couple were 100 metres away to the east. Not a single local passing by.

Action – Eddy trailed Purple Shirt over towards the couple and I stayed put at the front gate. As they were beginning to go through the offer, refusal, re-offer, push-off dance that happens a dozen times a morning, an FCC staffer ambled out and said hello, then wandered off towards the tree planter under which the HoGPIs stand for prayer and preparation to harass daily. There was a small, somewhat ornate, crucifix facing my way leaning against the tree planter. Purple Shirt places it there when she arrives daily.

I looked back up the street to the distant unfolding of the usual travesty of protest which is mainly punishment for patients exercising their legitimate rights. When my look returned closer to hand the FCC staffer was coming back my way with open hands, simple open shirt and a slight smile. Behind him the cross had disappeared. A few minutes later Purple Shirt got back from her latest harassment effort up the street and discovered the absence. Shortly thereafter a couple of her male colleagues of long standing arrived and a low grade gnashing of teeth and wailing set up at the loss.

One of the men suggested Eddy or I should go into the clinic and retrieve the absent cross. I suggested the guy go himself and denied with confidence that I knew anything of the matter. On the subsequent arrival of the first divvy van in 5 minutes I pre-empted the police enquiry of my awareness of relevant matters saying "I did not see anything I could swear to in a court of law" without any internal conflict. They accepted this for what it was.

I knew something had happened between looking up to see Eddy and Purple Shirt dance the patient harassment defence dance and looking beyond the FCC staffer as he passed by me towards the clinic. I ran it over three or four times to make sure. I still cannot recover any memory six days later. I am aware that my short-term memory has about a 5 second hole in it. Anything occurring in that sort of time frame may escape my notice unless lodged in a solid ongoing flow of attention – the kind which is characteristic of focus. I was focussed elsewhere at the time.

Resolution – Fifteen minutes later the second couple of police emerged from the FCC, walked over to the planter and appeared to wave their hands over the lily foliage and up sprang the lost cross. It was returned to Purple Shirt. Seemed it had been misplaced. At the time I did not know how it got there, and still do not.

The second cop couple had pulled up 5 minutes after the first and reran their interviews of those present who had been present from the start. The hands in the foliage foraged somehow from their efforts.